yesterday I made a note about the prof. Wolszczan, ending with the question of, in general, linking science and ethics. During an ongoing discussion lately about a possible Nobel Wolszczan (lucky prize was studying physics, elementary particles) is quite explicit zaznaczało a position completely separating these areas-roughly speaking, "what that sk ..., it's important that capable." Of course, a person claiming to be Nobel Prize for Wolszczan would be disadvantageous from the point of view, decent, honest man and machine counted among the zawistników, people "do not understand that the world is not just black and white" itd.itd. Insults used by opponents of lustration are widely known.
Some people, unfortunately, are not able to understand that there are people criticizing certain behavior not because of personal feelings, but out of respect for basic ethical principles, that is how I shall be accused of hatred or jealousy and the desire dokopania "better than myself ". As reported
portal Dziennik.pl ( source ) appeared just a chance to explain things using simple, clear example. Here's Max Planck Society spokeswoman said that Professor Wolszczan is no longer welcome as an employee of the Max Planck Institute in Bonn ( " We know that the professor. Wolszczan collaborated with the communist services when he was an employee of our institute. It is not with us no longer welcome ). Quite important is the formulation of " Employment person with such a past would be inconsistent with the ethical principles of our institutions."
Oh, ethical principles do not allow for the employment of an outstanding scientist just because he was a snitch. Envy? Underdevelopment? Black and white vision of the world? Desire settlements? Martyrdom of solidarity? Limited look?
Or just the usual gray, absolutely niemedialna, devoid of impact forces decency?
0 comments:
Post a Comment