you You thought that the propaganda has died at the end of communist regime? You thought, perhaps, that if not dead, it became more sophisticated, seeking to rely on even the tiniest of the actual basis? That thoughtless, even Chamsk propaganda seeking as much as any contact with reality, and assuming that its customers are completely incapable of any thought to the past?
I hope not, because the paste less dramatic example of just such a typically PRLowskiego style. I apologize in advance zapogwałcenie aesthetics in this way, calling the physiological reflexes tudziez other natural, in that case the reactions.
's "Overview" posted article begins like this:
fact that prosecutors closed the proceedings to urge 14-year-old girl to perform an abortion, there could be no surprise. Questionable and the simultaneous cancellation of the second thread of conduct - that is, a case of unlawful forced the girl to ensure that pregnancy does not remove, and to the prevention of an operation. And rightly so 14-year-old mother lodged a complaint against that decision to the prosecution. Guilty of harassment of her daughter probably should not so easily escape justice.
I emphasize, if it is not clear to everyone-I do not intend here to discuss the merits or lack of justification in this case abortion and abortion in general. My note is devoted to this subject. I just want to draw attention to the blatantly crude, thoughtless and even the style quote the whole article. This text can not be called polemical voice, and counted although the wider journalism. This is a statement about the nature of dogma, including the courts ready, digested to the extent that any of them thought that a discussion is impossible. One can only agree with them or not.
Few readers know "Review", so I do not know whether such remarks are commonplace their spiritual nourishment. I hope not, though there are indications that widespread in our society, completely thoughtless approach to reality-that perfectly harmonizes with such texts-is not accidental. Using a recently coined the term "lemingoza" it can be concluded that the article is food for lemmings, who is also the substance deepening illness.
made a last note about the bad habits they have introduced to the public debate surrounding environment "GW." Habits that are killing the debate; incriminatory article is no longer a visible sign of decay. It is not intended to persuasion, polemics-is simply a statement of thinking about something.
While differences of opinion (for any subjects) is something in every public space is necessary, it is for such texts as published in "Review" article on Agata / Jowicie in civilized public space is not any room. Many people-especially professed political sympathies close to that which would have an overview of the regrets that are missing in our society. It is impossible not to ask, therefore, a question- arise as to the "civil society" - the society of people aware of their choices, reflecting on the world around them and on the basis of their reflection on the involvement of decision makers and the type of involvement in public life?
If the term "self-reflection" is thought to mean cooked by any bodies and sold afterwards for a few pounds at a kiosk for people who inherit it to the property is through the act of sale / purchase, unfortunately-you need to realize that this is iżnie the same "self-reflection" by which As in the definition of "civil society".
The communist way of thinking was the desired collective approval for the government. Articles such as the one cited above were then precisely what the rulers need to control people.
Why such a tool is used now?
0 comments:
Post a Comment